first, i thank you for your decent answer, you seem like a polite person. second, perhaps i misinterpreted your first comment, but if i didn't then you're saying contradictory things:
1.זה מזעזע שגם בג"צ בעצם מסכים שהנפת דגל ישראל היא פרובוקציה
and also:
אירוע שדורש הקצאת כוחות מיוחדת (if i understand correctly, you think it's wrong that extra police forces should take part in what seems natural - the raising of our national flag)
as opposed to
2.ראשית, מי שמבקש להניף את דגל ישראל דווקא באום-אל-פאחם אכן רוצה לקדם את האג'נדה הפוליטית שלו. so whatתפקידו של המפכ"ל להגן בחרוף נפש (יעני, לגייס את כל כוח האדם האפשרי) על מימוש זכותם זו, כפי שהוא מגן על מצעד הגאווה בירושלים, על הנפת דגלי אש"פ בעת מלחמה בלב תל אביב וכו'

all of a sudden you claim that it is imperative to use more forces, you also indirectly admit that it's somewhat of a provocation ;
עניין מעצבן אך חוקי
so in that sense, your first comment, in which you expressed shock, was only theatrical or it was not well thought of before it was placed.
i am not a peace now activist and i do accept the supreme court's ruling on the issue of the settlement, but as you said:
החוק הבינלאומי נתון לפרשנויות רבות
exactly, and i've read good legal analyses which hold the settlements to be illegal. be this the case, then the supreme court took a clear side and made a zionist/military - POLITICAL - ruling on the matter. in the same way that interpreting the law as to approve of gay marriage is also a political decision (you can interpret it in a very different way if your understanding of what constitutes a family relies on judaism). i'm saying this because in your first comment you tried to depict the supreme court as a leftist political agent and i'm trying to make you a bit more critical towards your ideas.